Skip to content

The Dead Sea Scrolls

     This information evidences that the Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS) are another Jewish hoax—the site operators(s) are unknown, and like every link published here, use discernment and substantiate everything. Scoundrels hoaxed the Qumran discoveries, and Canaanites likely manufactured any alleged references to YHWH those manuscripts—purportedly dated between 150 BC and 70 AD—might reveal. These scrolls amount to a complete fraud that further exposes the tetragrammaton—serpents beguiled the minds of Yahwists, and these delusional or deliberate liars disseminate serpentine sexual heresies.

     The Qumran scrolls aren’t from the era deceivers attributed to them; nevertheless, Yahweh’s chosen utilize these fraudulent unearthings as “proof” YHWH is “Most High” because the tetragram surfaces within these “Hebrew” scriptures that don’t date any earlier than the Jewdified MT of 1000 AD. In Washington, D.C., a museum purchased DSS fragments that also turned out fake.

     Judaic mamzers, with historical connections to Yahwism, drafted the Dead Sea Scrolls, Masoretic Text (MT), and Shapira Strips, which showcase the tetragrammaton. Ancient Greek writings—excluding the purported “sacred name”—remain the oldest available Scriptural accounts.

     Excerpts from the article:

The Dead Sea scrolls are a mixture of old documents that were hidden in a number of caves to be found and used to support the establishment of Israel, a country intended for Jews only. The main document “finds” were in caves near the Qumran cemetery.

The first documents were “found” in 1947.

Israel was created in 1948.

In the decades following the establishment of Israel, texts were also “found” at other sites (Masada, Wadi Sdeir, Nahal Se’elim, Nahal Hever, and Murabba’at) in the Judean Desert. These, and the Dead Sea scrolls, are the only really old (well, supposedly really old) Biblical texts in the Hebrew language that have ever been found. All the previously known Biblical texts in Hebrew, date from later than 900 AD. Paul Kahle has stated:

It is a well-known fact that Hebrew Biblical MSS dating from the tenth and eleventh centuries are very rare. The so-called Babylonian Codex of the Prophets, dated A.D. 916,… has long been regarded as the oldest dated MS of (part of) the Hebrew Bible.”

Previous to the “finds”, critics had pointed to the late date of the Biblical texts in Hebrew, and deduced that the Hebrew Old Testament must have been translated from the Greek Old Testament, and not the other way round. Then, low and behold, a very timely miracle occurs. The Dead Sea scrolls are “found”, and dated to a thousand years earlier than the oldest previously known texts.

The critics are not given access to the scrolls, nor even photographs of the text, lest they spoil the party. In fact, for decades, only seven scholars are given access to the scrolls. This goes on until certain critics are dead and the scrolls have been purged of all anachronisms (like vowel points and Arabic numerals). Then, in 1991, only 45 years after their “discovery”, the Huntington Library, in San Marino, California, without consent, makes facsimile copies of the scrolls available to all.

So that, in brief, is the Dead Sea scrolls Hoax.

More, however, can be deduced.

One can even guess where the Dead Sea documents came from.

In Old Cairo, Egypt, there is a very old synagogue called the Ben Ezra Synagogue. Like many synagogues it has a storeroom, called a genizah, where worn-out religious books were stored prior to proper burial. Unlike many synagogues, the books in its genizah were never buried, so a treasure trove of ancient texts awaited discovery.

It turns out that some of the Dead Sea documents are nearly identical to texts from the Cairo Genizah. Many are similar, not only in content, but in style, and appearance. Some, not only have the same text, but also the same scribal markings. So, it is likely that many of the Dead Sea scrolls had their source in the treasure trove, that is, the Cairo Genizah. One suspects that the Elephantine letters, and the Nash papyrus, were also from the Cairo Genizah.

One document from the Dead Sea scrolls is of particular interest, the so called “Damascus Document”. Worldwide, there are twelve manuscripts of the “Damascus Document”; ten manuscripts from the Dead Sea scrolls and two manuscripts from the Cairo Genizah. There are no manuscripts of the “Damascus Document” from anywhere else. This strange distribution is a result of the fraud. It is very difficult to explain how copies of a work, that is claimed to have been written by scholars at Qumran, and hidden in caves there for two thousand years, ended up in the Cairo Genizah, and nowhere else. So difficult, in fact, that no one seems to have offered an explanation. The “Damascus Document” was first published in 1910 by Solomon Schechter in “Fragments of a Zadokite Work.”

Another couple of points:

The Biblical texts from Masada, Wadi Sdeir, Nahal Se’elim, Nahal Hever, and Murabba’at (twenty-five texts) are identical to the Masoretic text of the Bible, even though they were supposedly written a thousand years before. This is unheard of, and essentially proof, that Medieval documents were planted in the desert to be found by others.

It should be noted that a few Jewish scholars, in particular, Solomon Zeitlin, have long insisted that the Dead Sea scrolls were a Medieval production. Zeitlin was a well-known Talmudic scholar and would not claim this unless convinced it was true. Internal evidence from the scrolls themselves indicates a Medieval production. See, here.

It is estimated that up to 20 people occupied the site of Qumran (estimated by the number of inhabitants for whom there was room in the buildings). Now these 20 people were not just ordinary people, they read and wrote Greek, Phoenician, Aramaic, Nabataean, and Hebrew documents, like natives, and managed to write learned works on numerous religious topics (more than 900 manuscripts were “recovered”; about six hundred separate works), while gathering enough water, and raising enough food, for their survival, in a desert.

And, the fact that many scrolls are written on vellum (90% of them) proves these are indeed a Medieval production. The oldest vellum manuscript to which a definite date can be assigned is the treatise of Dioscorides on Medicines. It has been assigned to the year 510 AD, or thereabouts. The earliest estimated age of any vellum manuscript was, before the Dead Sea scrolls, the second century AD. So the mythical Qumran scholars were also, apparently, great innovators.

Interestingly, the 20 mythical Qumran scholars had between them, 36 copies of the Psalms, 26 copies of Deuteronomy, and 21 copies of the book of Isaiah. And all this at a time when one book was worth a king’s ransom. Such extravagance! Such waste! Such an unbelievable tale!

Anyway, I think it is clear that the Dead Sea scrolls, and the other texts from the Judean Desert, are simply a bunch of old documents that have been thrown together, planted in the desert, and sold to a gullible world.[1]

     The link also confirms that Jewry faked Yahwistic inscriptions on multiple ossuaries. Yids concocted “the Holocaust” and “ancient” Hebrew scroll legends to establish themselves in “Israel,” plus successfully sold both fictitious narratives to the deplorable masses.

     Yahwists’ primary source to authenticate YHWH comes from a foreign tribe that presumably authored the Talmud and Zohar. Ancient Hebrew manuscripts are nonexistent, so Yahwistic dupes don’t possess Scriptural testimony before medieval times to reinforce their precious Yahweh. Utilizing the MT is undesirable—Canaan/Esau formulated that with the Septuagint, as hitherto thought.

     The DSS collection mainly originates from the Jewish Ben Ezra Synagogue.

“And Adam knew his wife Eve, who was pregnant by Sammael [Satan], and she conceived and bare Cain, and he was like the heavenly beings, and not like earthly beings, and she said, I have gotten a man from the angel of the Lord.”- Genesis 4:1, Aramaic Targum

     This particular Hebrew/Aramaic verse is an interpolation, which aliens scribed—the much older LXX renditions of Genesis accurately portray biblical events. According to Emahiser, these Jew-created/planted scrolls have divine inspiration, although legitimate Greek documents from the 3rd-century BCE exclude such absurdities—the High Priests of carnal physical seduction stories promote the Qumran hoaxery to support contradictory untruths. Satanic seedliners accept literature penned by mutts and Gnostics to approve their dogmatic postulations.

     This interpolated reference from the Targum of Jonathan suggests that Sammael—a celestial angel of the Lord—impregnated Eve, whose progeny was like “heavenly beings.” Contrarily, the exclusive “Angel of the Lord” throughout the Old Testament is God Almighty; hence, uninspired text surfaces in this verse. Dual-Seedliners who dismiss authoritative corrections should experience rejection until Scriptural maturity ensues. Christianity has multifarious problems; twisted doctrines add extra wounds to an already lacerated body.

     Paleo-Hebrew is essentially Paleo-Greek—the letters are comparable, with many alphanumeric characters that directly match; furthermore, White Semites invented the Phoenician and Greek languages. The other “Hebrew” tongues are crud, including all biblical manuscripts employing these accursed dialects, which typically uphold the “sacred name” and “serpent seed” falsities.

“Two beings [Adam and Nachash] had intercourse with Eve, and she conceived from both and bore two children. Each followed one of the male parents, and their spirits parted, one to this side and one to the other, and similarly their characters. On the side of Cain are all the haunts of the evil species; from the side of Abel comes a more merciful class, yet not wholly beneficial — good wine mixed with bad.” – Zohar Bereshith, 36b

     Several CI teachers embrace mystical Zohar fantasies to validate Canaanitish fables.

“When the serpent copulated with Eve, he infused her with lust.” – Yebamoth 103b

“You rightly said that when the serpent had carnal intercourse with Eve he injected into her defilement.” – Haye Sarah 126b

“For when the serpent came upon Eve he injected lust into her.” – Shabbath 146a

“…at the time that the snake had intercourse with Eve, he introduced filth into her.” – Yevamot 103b

“The doctrine that Eve mated with the serpent, or with Satan, to produce Cain also appears in early Gnostic writings such as the Gospel of Philip (c. 350); however, this teaching was explicitly rejected as heresy by Irenaeus (c. 180) and later mainstream Christian theologians. A similar doctrine appeared in Jewish midrashic texts in the 9th century and in the Kabbalah.

The Serpent Seed idea appears in a 9th century book called Pirke De-Rabbi Eliezer. Rabbi David Max Eichhorn, in his book Cain: Son of the Serpent, traces the idea back through early Jewish Midrashic texts and identifies many rabbis who taught that Cain was the son of the union between the serpent and Eve.”[2]

     The Dual-Seedline hypothesis is rabbinical misinformation that mongrelized CI pastors circulate, and sacred nameology is additional bunkum rabbis propagate. Most preachers who spread such filth are “tribesmen” with alien attributes—the remainder parrot falsehoods.

     Among the proponents of assorted seedline rubbish lurks Zen Garcia, a mongrel and ardent supporter of silliness like “Lucifer” and erotic copulation schisms, with two books on the subject—hardcore seedliners are mostly bastards whom Scripture doesn’t accommodate.

Genesis 4:1 “And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.”

Genesis 4:17 “And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.”

Genesis 4:25 “And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew.”

     Storytellers place magical twists on Genesis 4:1, but consistent textual flows demonstrate the Bible correctly states these husbands “knew” their wives and produced offspring, without secret “gang-bangs” where dark-skinned hominids—or supervillains with supernatural shape-shifting abilities—inseminated them beforehand.

Categories

Uncategorized

Tags

, , ,

sschm View All

https://imgur.com/a/BqiEq

One thought on “The Dead Sea Scrolls Leave a comment

  1. Supporters of the sexual serpent seed theory have the Babylonian Talmud, Zohar Kabbalah, Jewish Aramaic Targums, and Jew-planted Dead Sea Scrolls to support their gross falsehoods; however, considering the source, such documents only further evidence this doctrine as erroneous.

Leave a comment